Content Review and Validation Process for Accreditation

PeerPoint Accreditation Manual

Intro to PeerPoint and Adult Learning
Intro to ACCME
Documentation and Information Requirements for CME Accreditation
The CME BackOffice Application – Logistics
Accreditation Checklist
Disclosure by Presenter/Author
- Are there other relevant financial relationships?
- Is the Presenter/Author an owner or employee of a commercial interest?
Disclosure and Review of Financial Relationships
Education Planning
Evaluation
- Methods of Evaluation Used
Processes for the disclosure of Relevant Financial Relationships and Resolution of Potential Conflicts of Interests.
- Are there other relevant financial relationships?
- Is the Chairperson, Planner, Medical Editor, Reviewer or Manager (Team Member)
Appendix A: Standards for Standards for Integrity and Independence in Accredited Continuing Education℠
Appendix B: Glossary and Terms
Content Review and Validation Process for Accreditation
Content Validation Criteria
- Clinical Education Abstract
- Research Abstract
Review of Financial Relationship for Potential Conflict of Interest
- Process for Financial Relationship Review for Potential Conflict of Interest
Team and Agenda Manager Process
- Explanation of Team Member Roles
Conflict of Interest Sample Resolution Form
- Publication Requirements for CME Accreditation

All content presented as part of an accredited activity must be free from commercial bias and based on sound medical information. PeerPoint has implemented the following process for reviewing and validating content to be free from commercial bias and of sound medical information.